|
|
US Mall 1 - Nikon Coolpix P60 8.1MP Digital Camera with 5x Optical Zoom with Vibration Reduction (Black)

|
List Price:
Our Price: Too low to display
Your Save: $ ( % )
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Manufacturer: Nikon
|
Average Customer Rating:     

|
|
Batteries Included: 0 Binding: Electronics Brand: Nikon Color: Black Display Size: 2.5 EAN: 0018208255931 Feature: 8.1-megapixel resolution for stunning prints as large as 16 x 20 inches Floppy Disk Drive Description: None Has Red Eye Reduction: 1 Is Autographed: 0 Is Memorabilia: 0 Label: Nikon Manufacturer: Nikon Maximum Focal Length: 32 Maximum Resolution: 8 Minimum Focal Length: 6.4 Model: 25593 Optical Zoom: 5 Publisher: Nikon Release Date: 2008-02-18 Special Features: nv:Sensor^8.1 Megapixel|Size^1/2.3-inch|Image Resolution^3264 x 2448|Movie Resolution^640 x 480|Memory Included^12MB Internal|Storage Media^SD/SDHC Memory Card|Compressed Format^JPEG (Exif Ver 2.2)|Compressed Format^DPOF|Compressed Format^DCF 2.0|Movie File Format^AVI|Optical Zoom^5x|Focal Length^6.4-32.0mm|Focus Mode^Contrast detection AF|LCD Monitor^2.5-inches|LCD Pixels^201,000 pixels|LCD Coverage^100%|Maximum Aperture^F 3.6 - 4.5|Exposure Modes^Program Auto Studio: Nikon
|
|
|
Features
|
8.1-megapixel resolution for stunning prints as large as 16 x 20 inches 5x optical zoom; vibration reduction 2.7-inch high-resolution LCD; Electronic Viewfinder In-Camera Red-Eye Fix; enhanced Face-Priority AF automatically focuses on up to 12 faces Capture images to SD memory card (not included)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:      Summary: Great pics if you learn the ropes Comment: The color, subtle contrast/tone changes, and pixel rolloff on this are much more natural than the canon or kodak I've owned in this price range. That's why I got this unit. Sample pics at one site were almost identical to the D60 shots. Light is the difference though...this has a lot less glass. I fixed the frequent blurr by switching to center focus (not face) and fixed the motion blurr and got lower ASA by spreading a tripod short-legged (even when not planted) for dim shots. Once I worked with "P" mode for focus, ASA, exposure, etc. I got some outstanding shots. To move beyond point-shoot at a lower cost takes work, but this gives me that real natural color and contrast subtlety. Only Nikon and Fuji seem to do that. Fuji is still a bit sluggish. Nice shirt cam, super if you fiddle in P mode and steady things. I always MUST have electronic viewfinder...that's a big seller in the sun!
Customer Rating:      Summary: not what I needed Comment: No charger ,only batteries
No Computer camera
No card to save data
No Cover to put in
Customer Rating:      Summary: Good enough to buy again Comment: I purchased this camera in March and really liked how the pictures turned out and the fact that it's compact, light weight and takes very good pictures, especially high-resolution close ups. My fiance liked it a lot as well and took it to Kenya for three months. The camera mysteriously disappeared from his possession after two months. So we decided to purchase another one. We use the rechargable AA batteries, which last much much longer than the regular alkaline ones. Very nice camera for the price.
Customer Rating:      Summary: Nikon Coolpix P60 8.1MB - a good choice Comment: Sufficient depth of menues, picture are very sharp, chip speed great.
Use ultra II or III SD card to save picture fast. Enjoy!
Customer Rating:      Summary: Nice features but poor quality Comment: The Nikon P60 has really nice features for the price: it has a handy (electronic) view-finder (that isn't painful to use because you don't need to squint like mad), useful 5x zoom and helpful optical image stabilization (VR). However, to me, the deal breaker was the fact that it uses the ubiquitous AA cell instead of an expensive proprietary battery. This is great for traveling - if your batteries die, you can get replacement AA's just about anywhere.
Having said these, the biggest issue I have with the camera is its quality or lack there of. I had the P60 for less than a month and it doesn't work anymore. It has never been dropped, always in a padded case when not in use, and since it is the wife's camera, it is normally in a nice, big purse. It complains about a `lens error' and I can't take pictures with it; I can, however, view some of the pictures though - yea, big woof. Someone at Nikon seriously botched the Quality Assurance (QA) on this thing.
I had another Nikon years ago, the Coolpix 4300, and its quality was abysmal as well; should have learned my lesson, or Nikon should have replaced its useless QA personnel(s) so that the P60 would be a bit more reliable.
On the other hand, just before owning the P60, I had the Casio EX-Z120 compact camera. It was as tough as a brick - the case is completely made of metal. It was used all over Asia, dropped numerous times (even on cement), and missing a couple of screws, but for almost 2 years it never let me down until it was lost/stolen.
I greatly lament buying Nikon compact cameras; should have bought Canon, or another EX-Z120. I can only take solace on the fact that Nikon may honour their 2 year warranty.
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
Customer Rating:      Summary: Great pics if you learn the ropes Comment: The color, subtle contrast/tone changes, and pixel rolloff on this are much more natural than the canon or kodak I've owned in this price range. That's why I got this unit. Sample pics at one site were almost identical to the D60 shots. Light is the difference though...this has a lot less glass. I fixed the frequent blurr by switching to center focus (not face) and fixed the motion blurr and got lower ASA by spreading a tripod short-legged (even when not planted) for dim shots. Once I worked with "P" mode for focus, ASA, exposure, etc. I got some outstanding shots. To move beyond point-shoot at a lower cost takes work, but this gives me that real natural color and contrast subtlety. Only Nikon and Fuji seem to do that. Fuji is still a bit sluggish. Nice shirt cam, super if you fiddle in P mode and steady things. I always MUST have electronic viewfinder...that's a big seller in the sun!
Customer Rating:      Summary: not what I needed Comment: No charger ,only batteries
No Computer camera
No card to save data
No Cover to put in
Customer Rating:      Summary: Good enough to buy again Comment: I purchased this camera in March and really liked how the pictures turned out and the fact that it's compact, light weight and takes very good pictures, especially high-resolution close ups. My fiance liked it a lot as well and took it to Kenya for three months. The camera mysteriously disappeared from his possession after two months. So we decided to purchase another one. We use the rechargable AA batteries, which last much much longer than the regular alkaline ones. Very nice camera for the price.
Customer Rating:      Summary: Nikon Coolpix P60 8.1MB - a good choice Comment: Sufficient depth of menues, picture are very sharp, chip speed great.
Use ultra II or III SD card to save picture fast. Enjoy!
Customer Rating:      Summary: Nice features but poor quality Comment: The Nikon P60 has really nice features for the price: it has a handy (electronic) view-finder (that isn't painful to use because you don't need to squint like mad), useful 5x zoom and helpful optical image stabilization (VR). However, to me, the deal breaker was the fact that it uses the ubiquitous AA cell instead of an expensive proprietary battery. This is great for traveling - if your batteries die, you can get replacement AA's just about anywhere.
Having said these, the biggest issue I have with the camera is its quality or lack there of. I had the P60 for less than a month and it doesn't work anymore. It has never been dropped, always in a padded case when not in use, and since it is the wife's camera, it is normally in a nice, big purse. It complains about a `lens error' and I can't take pictures with it; I can, however, view some of the pictures though - yea, big woof. Someone at Nikon seriously botched the Quality Assurance (QA) on this thing.
I had another Nikon years ago, the Coolpix 4300, and its quality was abysmal as well; should have learned my lesson, or Nikon should have replaced its useless QA personnel(s) so that the P60 would be a bit more reliable.
On the other hand, just before owning the P60, I had the Casio EX-Z120 compact camera. It was as tough as a brick - the case is completely made of metal. It was used all over Asia, dropped numerous times (even on cement), and missing a couple of screws, but for almost 2 years it never let me down until it was lost/stolen.
I greatly lament buying Nikon compact cameras; should have bought Canon, or another EX-Z120. I can only take solace on the fact that Nikon may honour their 2 year warranty.
Array
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|