|
|
US Mall 1 - Head Over Heels (aka Chilly Scenes of Winter)
|
List Price: $19.98
Our Price: $18.65
Your Save: $ 1.33 ( 7% )
Availability:
Manufacturer: MGM (Video & DVD)
Starring: John Heard, Mary Beth Hurt, Peter Riegert, Kenneth McMillan, Gloria Grahame
Directed By: Joan Micklin Silver
|
Average Customer Rating: 
|
|
Audience Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Binding: VHS Tape
EAN: 9786301966238
Format: Color
ISBN: 6301966236
Label: MGM (Video & DVD)
Manufacturer: MGM (Video & DVD)
Number Of Items: 1
Publisher: MGM (Video & DVD)
Release Date: 1993-01-27
Running Time: 92
Studio: MGM (Video & DVD)
Theatrical Release Date: 1979
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spotlight customer reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Beg for a DVD release!
Comment: Maybe it's just my age (baby boomer), but this edgy romantic comedy from 1979 has such wit and charm, it has always had a very special place in my heart. John Heard plays a somewhat lost, slightly wounded romantic, and Mary Beth Hurt is the perfect companion he meets while she's separated from the husband she never should have married. They are brought to life from Ann Beattie's novel with such commitment, it's a joy. The secondary characters, every single one, are all such a treat as well. The late Ken McMillan and Gloria Grahame, Peter Riegert when he was just starting out, they're all wonderful. Find a copy of this movie and enjoy!
Customer Rating: 
Summary: A nostalgic view of love in the 1970s
Comment: If you see this film today under its original title, "Chilly Scenes of Winter", you will probably be most struck by watching two part players from "The Sopranos" -- John Heard and Peter Reigert -- in their youth with long hair. Both play middle aged patsies in the HBO crime series. The other thing that will strike most viewers is that the heroine's husband once played "the maestro" on "Seinfeld".
What I think you will not understand is how realistic this film is about love in the 1970s, when love meant lack of commitment and possibly trying it out with several people at a time. In this regard Hurt's character, "Charles", is the metaphor for lovelorn men in that era. Charles spends the entirety of the movie not getting over the breakup with his girlfriend "Laura" (played by Mary Beth Hurt) who he saw while she was still married to the masetro character.
There is little that is great or terrific in this movie other than its realistic view of 1970s love, during a time when people weren't conditioned to hate homosexuals and everyone believed in the cliche that it's OK if it's legal and doesn't hurt anyone. This movie shows it does hurt people, emotionally as well as physically.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Loved The Original Ending
Comment: This is one of my favorite films of all time. The original ending is the only way for the film to end. There are those of us out there who really do believe in fate and happily ever after. I am one of them. If you ever get the chance to see the original, see it! Head Over Heels is what it was called when I saw it on HBO nearly 25 years ago (not the Chilly Scenes of Winter, how did that title come about?), anyway, is a very emotional and intellectual film. A+A+A+A+ Long live the romantics in the world. Will SOMEONE release this film in it's original version!
Customer Rating:
Summary: AN OVERLOOKED CONTEMPORARY CLASSIC
Comment: This is one of the best films few people have heard of! I don't know about some people, but I LIKED the new ending of the re-edited version. I mean, happy endings are nice and all that, but sometimes things just don't wrap up neatly and I thought this ending really fit the film as a whole. Although I would be interested in seeing Silver's original cut. You know, MGM could prepare a special DVD containing Ms. Silver's original cut on Side 1 and the re-edit on Side 2. But it will never happen. And it's a shame. It would be the perfect candidate for MGM's "Contemporary Classics" series.John Heard, where are you? You seemed to disappear from film. Such a good, understated performance deserved Oscar recognition. But of course, unless the pic is a hit, you don't get nominations. How else to account for this year's lackluster selection?
Customer Rating:
Summary: I liked Head Over Heels ending better!
Comment: I first saw the original(Head Over Heels) on cable in 1981. I loved the original ending when Charles returns from the park and finds Laura in the kitchen making the famous dessert. He was amazed that she kept the house key. "You kept the key", he repeated while she tried to excuse herself for being there. He wanted so much for her to want him while he nearly went insane waiting for her to come back to him. Yeah, I can sympathize with Charles; been there done that. But the original ending gave us romantics some hope. When my "Laura" closed the door, I never looked back and I never saw her again [that was 19 yrs ago]. When I saw the re-release in 1982 I was a bit disappointed in the ending. If I remembered correctly, the ending in the book was similar to the original cut. Why did they change it? According to a review in the NY Times, Ann Beattie requested the change. Why? Who knows.I searched the web for the video with the original ending and found a copy that listed listed "Woman in Park" as one of the characters. The scene in the park was cut so I thought I had found it. When I opened the video at home I found it was the re-released version. I continued my quest and emailed MGM/UA and several other places without response. By chance I tried a newsgroup. I got a reply from someone who said the re-released ending is the only version available on video because the original was made before videos were existed. So, unless someone at the studio picked up the 16mm film from the editing room floor we will never see the better ending.
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews:
|
Customer Rating:
Summary: Beg for a DVD release!
Comment: Maybe it's just my age (baby boomer), but this edgy romantic comedy from 1979 has such wit and charm, it has always had a very special place in my heart. John Heard plays a somewhat lost, slightly wounded romantic, and Mary Beth Hurt is the perfect companion he meets while she's separated from the husband she never should have married. They are brought to life from Ann Beattie's novel with such commitment, it's a joy. The secondary characters, every single one, are all such a treat as well. The late Ken McMillan and Gloria Grahame, Peter Riegert when he was just starting out, they're all wonderful. Find a copy of this movie and enjoy!
Customer Rating:
Summary: A nostalgic view of love in the 1970s
Comment: If you see this film today under its original title, "Chilly Scenes of Winter", you will probably be most struck by watching two part players from "The Sopranos" -- John Heard and Peter Reigert -- in their youth with long hair. Both play middle aged patsies in the HBO crime series. The other thing that will strike most viewers is that the heroine's husband once played "the maestro" on "Seinfeld".
What I think you will not understand is how realistic this film is about love in the 1970s, when love meant lack of commitment and possibly trying it out with several people at a time. In this regard Hurt's character, "Charles", is the metaphor for lovelorn men in that era. Charles spends the entirety of the movie not getting over the breakup with his girlfriend "Laura" (played by Mary Beth Hurt) who he saw while she was still married to the masetro character.
There is little that is great or terrific in this movie other than its realistic view of 1970s love, during a time when people weren't conditioned to hate homosexuals and everyone believed in the cliche that it's OK if it's legal and doesn't hurt anyone. This movie shows it does hurt people, emotionally as well as physically.
Customer Rating:
Summary: Loved The Original Ending
Comment: This is one of my favorite films of all time. The original ending is the only way for the film to end. There are those of us out there who really do believe in fate and happily ever after. I am one of them. If you ever get the chance to see the original, see it! Head Over Heels is what it was called when I saw it on HBO nearly 25 years ago (not the Chilly Scenes of Winter, how did that title come about?), anyway, is a very emotional and intellectual film. A+A+A+A+ Long live the romantics in the world. Will SOMEONE release this film in it's original version!
Customer Rating:
Summary: AN OVERLOOKED CONTEMPORARY CLASSIC
Comment: This is one of the best films few people have heard of! I don't know about some people, but I LIKED the new ending of the re-edited version. I mean, happy endings are nice and all that, but sometimes things just don't wrap up neatly and I thought this ending really fit the film as a whole. Although I would be interested in seeing Silver's original cut. You know, MGM could prepare a special DVD containing Ms. Silver's original cut on Side 1 and the re-edit on Side 2. But it will never happen. And it's a shame. It would be the perfect candidate for MGM's "Contemporary Classics" series.John Heard, where are you? You seemed to disappear from film. Such a good, understated performance deserved Oscar recognition. But of course, unless the pic is a hit, you don't get nominations. How else to account for this year's lackluster selection?
Customer Rating:
Summary: I liked Head Over Heels ending better!
Comment: I first saw the original(Head Over Heels) on cable in 1981. I loved the original ending when Charles returns from the park and finds Laura in the kitchen making the famous dessert. He was amazed that she kept the house key. "You kept the key", he repeated while she tried to excuse herself for being there. He wanted so much for her to want him while he nearly went insane waiting for her to come back to him. Yeah, I can sympathize with Charles; been there done that. But the original ending gave us romantics some hope. When my "Laura" closed the door, I never looked back and I never saw her again [that was 19 yrs ago]. When I saw the re-release in 1982 I was a bit disappointed in the ending. If I remembered correctly, the ending in the book was similar to the original cut. Why did they change it? According to a review in the NY Times, Ann Beattie requested the change. Why? Who knows.I searched the web for the video with the original ending and found a copy that listed listed "Woman in Park" as one of the characters. The scene in the park was cut so I thought I had found it. When I opened the video at home I found it was the re-released version. I continued my quest and emailed MGM/UA and several other places without response. By chance I tried a newsgroup. I got a reply from someone who said the re-released ending is the only version available on video because the original was made before videos were existed. So, unless someone at the studio picked up the 16mm film from the editing room floor we will never see the better ending.
Array
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
